Saturday, September 21, 2013

Expert Testimony: Should the Jury or Judge Decide?

According to Britannica, an expert witness is one who mustiness(prenominal) switch interchange intimacy, skill, or experience in the area of their testimonial. For the closely part, they do not testify concerning facts but draw inferences from them. It is their specialized knowledge that differentiates expert witnesses from fact witnesses and allows them to testify using conclusions and opinions quite a than just facts. This power can cause problems in the courtroom, much(prenominal) as presentations of bow information or jury confusion, which is wherefore judges have taken it upon themselves to act as gatekeepers with check to admission of expert evidence. What is legally allowed as expert testimony has been debated for centuries and opinions on rigidity of admission standards have changed over time. deuce-ace major cases, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Khumo v. Carmichael, and Frye v. U.S. have had a significant impact on the admissibility criteria of expe rt testimony and heightened the debate of judges rights to act as gatekeepers. Expert witnesses are collected in the courtroom in order to clarify scientific ideas or relate world(a) truths to the jury. there are many different types of experts, including credentialed, experiential and academic.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The pop the apparent motion of each type of witness is to clarify a scientific concept crucial to a specific case that a jury would not otherwise understand. These experts hold a raft of power in the courtroom because they can give conclusions corroborate on certain facts, and if a jury believes them, the experts essentially succeed the ju ry in the decision- reservation process (Jus! tice Learned Hand). Judges wishing to make sure that each of these experts are qualified high-spirited to give an opinion that would not taint the jurys opinion in a wrongful way. However, while making a decision on which experts are allowed, judges must maintain a careful balance between preventing stroke and junk science in the courtroom while not denying the jurys right to see all germane(predicate) evidence. Juries...If you fatality to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.